Commons:Quality images candidates
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose[edit]
The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines[edit]
All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators[edit]
Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements[edit]
- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator[edit]
- Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements[edit]
More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution[edit]
Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality[edit]
Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting[edit]
The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value[edit]
Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate[edit]
Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations[edit]
No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images[edit]
Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review[edit]
.svg)
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion[edit]
If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision[edit]
QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2024.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]
Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 26 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process[edit]
Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review[edit]
To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules[edit]
See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations[edit]
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
January 26, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Ancient roman city of Pompeii, Italy --Poco a poco 09:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ancient roman city of Pompeii, Italy --Poco a poco 09:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)~
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Amphitheatre, Paestum, Italy --Poco a poco 09:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ancient roman city of Pompeii, Italy --Poco a poco 09:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 09:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Plassenburg in Kulmbach, aerial view. --Ermell 09:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Plassenburg in Kulmbach, aerial view. --Ermell 09:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Interior of the chapel in Hubenberg, a district of Waischenfeld --Ermell 09:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Chancel of the chapel in Siegritzberg --Ermell 09:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gargoyle at Reichmannsdorf Castle --Ermell 09:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: USS Seawolf (SSN-575) submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Skate-class submarine profile --Mike1979 Russia 06:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_08.jpg/120px-Tarasp_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_08.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street 152.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street 152.
-
_03.jpg/80px-Tarasp_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_03.jpg)
- Nomination Detail Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street. (Wooden Cross)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street. (Wooden Cross)
-
_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_05.jpg/120px-Kasteel_Tarasp_(Tarasp_Castle)_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_05.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden.
-
-
-
- Nomination CPEF 193 “Jiboia”. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Rain Vortex, Jewel Changi, Singapore. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bust of Manuel Magariños Castaños. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The interior of the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center, New York City, USA. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail at "Kirchrangen" mountain in "Bundorfer Forst" forest --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Populus alba in "Erlbach reed bed" natural monument near Gemeinfeld --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-D-6-74-163-82_Friedhofskreuz_Westheim_(Knetzgau).jpg)
- Nomination: Cemetery cross in Westheim (Knetzgau) (Detail) --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Franconian Saale river in Bad Kissingen --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-An_der_Fränkischen_Saale_südlich_der_Südbrücke_in_Bad_Kissingen_(Panorama).jpg)
- Nomination: Meadow next to Franconian Saale river south of Bad Kissingen --Plozessor 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Marktplatz_in_Zwingenberg_(2).jpg)
- Nomination View of Marktplatz in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/71px-Town_hall_of_Zwingenberg_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Town hall of Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Pass_3_in_Zwingenberg_(4).jpg)
- Nomination Building at Pass 3 in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Pass_9_in_Zwingenberg_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Building at Pass 9 in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Loewenplatz_6_in_Zwingenberg_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Building at Löwenplatz 6 in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Marthalen_-_Zum_alten_Wirtshaus_(Teilansicht).jpg)
- Nomination „Zum alten Wirtshaus“ in Marthalen, canton of Zurich --JoachimKohler-HB 05:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-St._Sigismund-Kirche_Daverden_(Gem._Langwedel).jpg)
- Nomination Church of St Sigismund in Daverden, Lower Saxony --JoachimKohler-HB 04:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Illuminated lower floor of the LVM 5 “Kristall” high-rise building of the LVM insurance company in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support I usually don't promote ICM pictures due lack of applicable guidelines, but this does really capture the atmosphere and gives the impression of driving by the building. --Plozessor 05:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
_01.jpg/86px-Statue_of_Ulugh_Beg_(Samarkand)_01.jpg)
-
-
- Nomination Ulugh Beg Observatory Museum, Samakand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 04:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kazakh Eli Monument, Astana, Kazahkstan --Bgag 04:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reed bed at the «Edelweiß bath» on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque and house numbers at the fence of villa Almrausch on Hauptstraße #110 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Almrausch on Hauptstraße #110 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Edelweiß on Hauptstraße #106 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marienvilla on Hauptstraße #112 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_at_Wat_Si_Khom_Kham_Jan_2024.jpg/120px-Phayao_-_Ubosot_(ordination_hall)_at_Wat_Si_Khom_Kham_Jan_2024.jpg)
-
- Nomination Rear (east) facade, St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Church, Cantonment, Allahabad --Tagooty 02:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Asian openbill stork (Anastomus oscitans) drinking in the river, Ranganathittu Bird Sanctuary --Tagooty 02:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination CSI Wesley Cathedral, Mysore, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 02:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red clouds over the Mekong banks with dwellings and pirogues at sunrise in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 01:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
_08.jpg)
_03.jpg)
_Scuol,_18-09-2023._(actm.)_05.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_at_Wat_Si_Khom_Kham_Jan_2024.jpg)
January 25, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Le choeur de l'église paroissiale de Saint-Léonard. --Espandero 21:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This is a) a bit noisy, b) the sunlit spots are burned out and c) the right side is too dark. Would accept each of those, but probably not the combination. Any chance to improve it with better raw conversion? --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: L'ancienne église Saint-Laurent de Riddes. --Espandero 21:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Very good image. Slight CW tilt. Blurred spot in the sky to the right of the steeple could be cloned out. Useful to add the cemetery in the Summary/Description. --Tagooty 02:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: La Maya vue depuis le château de la Soie. --Espandero 21:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Le Portalet vu depuis Reppaz. --Espandero 21:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination The church of Agios Nickolaos of Moulos, Aegina. --C messier 20:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Seems to lean out, slightly on the left side but more on the right side. Or is the building crooked? --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Perspective was a bit overcorrected but the walls are also crooked. --C messier 09:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination: Jesuit Monastery of Kalamitsia. --C messier 20:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Katalagari fortress, Crete. --C messier 20:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Tempi Madonna - Raphael --GoldenArtists 19:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (FL) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz S214 300e in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
%2C_janvier_2024.jpg/86px-Pâté_en_croûte%2C_Le_Café_Français_(Bourg-en-Bresse)%2C_janvier_2024.jpg)
- Nomination: Pâté en croûte, Le Café Français (Bourg-en-Bresse), janvier 2024. --Benoît Prieur 17:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination CPEF 193 “Jiboia”. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 14:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agave shawii at Jardin de Cactus in 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 14:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Manuel Magariños Castaños. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 14:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination AMX International at Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 14:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matka canyon seen from road leading to Sveta Petka dam. --Kallerna 14:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Stavanger. --Kallerna 14:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination "Trollpikken" rock formation in Magma UNESCO Global Geopark. --Kallerna 14:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kozjak Lake, the biggest artificial lake on the Treska River. --Kallerna 14:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The end of recently excavated tunnel in Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository. --Kallerna 14:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_1X7A1867.jpg/120px-DS_4_Cross_(2021)_1X7A1867.jpg)
- Nomination: DS 4 Cross in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cupra Formentor VZ5 BAT in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 11:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg)
- Nomination: Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) male --Charlesjsharp 11:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) female --Charlesjsharp 11:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_pair_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_pair_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) pair --Charlesjsharp 11:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_Darwin_2.jpg/120px-Brown_honeyeater_(Lichmera_indistincta_indistincta)_Darwin_2.jpg)
- Nomination Brown honeyeater (Lichmera indistincta) --Charlesjsharp 11:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_Adelaide.jpg/120px-Buff-banded_rail_(Hypotaenidia_philippensis_mellori)_Adelaide.jpg)
- Nomination: Buff-banded rail (Hypotaenidia philippensis mellori) --Charlesjsharp 11:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_en_janvier_2024.jpg/120px-Rue_Charles_Gide_(Poitiers)_en_janvier_2024.jpg)
- Nomination Rue Charles Gide (Poitiers) en janvier 2024. --Benoît Prieur 09:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1784) near Wiltingen, Germany. --Palauenc05 09:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1788) near Wiltingen, Germany. --Palauenc05 09:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1882) near Konz-Oberemmel, Germany. --Palauenc05 09:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OA Mk 30 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 08:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LT 38 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 08:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LT 38 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 08:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LT 38 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 08:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tatra 57K at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 08:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review A bit too bright for me -- Spurzem 11:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I agree... --Draceane 22:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plassenburg in Kulmbach --Ermell 07:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plassenburg in Kulmbach --Ermell 07:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine between Breitenlesau and Zochenreuth --Ermell 07:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Morpho peleides at Mariposario del Drago --Mike Peel 07:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose noisy and unfortunate background --Charlesjsharp 11:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aloe claviflora at Jardin de Cactus --Mike Peel 07:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Grand Central Terminal at night --Mike Peel 07:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Variegated hosta at Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wicker sculpture of a badger and other animals at Stourhead --Mike Peel 07:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: House, Avenue de la Marne 35, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 07:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination Dalila Ali Rajah at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 07:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Synthia Okorafor at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 07:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/84px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(04).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/39px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(05).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(06).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(07).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/81px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(08).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_04.jpg/86px-Tarasp_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg)
- Nomination Detail Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street. (Wooden door)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street. (Wooden door)
-
_05.jpg/120px-Tarasp_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_05.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. House on Sparsels street.
-
_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg/120px-Kasteel_Tarasp_(Tarasp_Castle)_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden (outbuilding)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden (outbuilding)
-
.jpg/120px-Pass_9_in_Zwingenberg_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Building at Pass 9 in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/94px-Loewenplatz_6_in_Zwingenberg_(5).jpg)
- Nomination: Building at Löwenplatz 6 in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment Would be better with more exposure. --Bgag 15:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/63px-Aul_in_Zwingenberg_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Aul in Zwingenberg, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Bad_Bergzabern_Castle_(16).jpg)
- Nomination: Bad Bergzabern Castle, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Seems slightly leaning outward, otherwise good. Or is the building on the right side crooked? --Plozessor 05:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/86px-Koenigstrasse_42_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Königstraße 42 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Natural monument "Jackdaw beech" near Humprechtshausen --Plozessor 05:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silene vulgaris at "Wachstein" mountain in Franconian Switzerland --Plozessor 05:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_(2).jpg/120px-D-6-74-147-175_Filialkirche_St._Laurentius_(Sailershausen)_(2).jpg)
-
.jpg/69px-D-6-73-174-18_Bildstock%2C_Mittelweg_(Trappstadt).jpg)
- Nomination Shrine in Chapel of Our Lady of Sorrows in Trappstadt --Plozessor 05:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glass sculpture “Body and Soul” (Duk-Kyu Ryang, 2015) on the LVM campus in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Adele on 10.-Oktober-Straße #94 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on 10.-Oktober-Straße #129 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on 10.-Oktober-Strasse #131 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apartment building on Gaisrückenstraße #15 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Distribution substation on Gaisrückenstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anand Bhavan (Nehru residence) with plaque, constructed 1927 by Motilal Nehru, Allahabad, UP, India. --Tagooty 00:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Anand Bhavan front (Nehru residence), Allahabad --Tagooty 00:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Northern dome of Bibi-Khanym Mosque, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Courtyard of Bibi-Khanym Mosque, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 00:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
,_janvier_2024.jpg)
_1X7A1867.jpg)
_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg)
_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
_pair_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
_Darwin_2.jpg)
_Adelaide.jpg)
_en_janvier_2024.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_04.jpg)
_05.jpg)
_Scuol,_18-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(2).jpg)
.jpg)
January 24, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination Front views of Jatiyo Smriti Soudho, Bangladesh. By User:Nasirkhan --আফতাবুজ্জামান 23:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Ramsagar National Park, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. By User:Abdulmominbd --আফতাবুজ্জামান 23:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Jhal Bhuna, Beef dishes of Bangladesh. By User:Munni Akter Mim --আফতাবুজ্জামান 23:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Mixed Salad. By User:Munni Akter Mim --আফতাবুজ্জামান 23:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rui Macher Bhuna. By User:Munni Akter Mim --আফতাবুজ্জামান 23:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination: Balm-leaved archangel (Lamium orvala) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Monorail_de_vigne_-_gorges_de_la_Morge_(2).jpg)
-
- Nomination: Le village de Grône vu depuis la colline de Pintset en mai 2023. --Espandero 19:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Stunning picture, but unfortunately there is a really blurry area in the middle foreground (added a note). --Plozessor 05:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
(And it would also need a Panorama template.) --Plozessor 05:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Plozessor: I added the Panorama template but I don't think I can do anything about the blurry parts. They are most surely due to my motion at the moment I took the pictures I used to make the panorama. - Espandero 19:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: L'embouchure de la Sionne dans le Rhône à Sion en mai 2023. --Espandero 19:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination: La fresque aux couleurs de Berne sur le mur extérieur du château de Chillon. --Espandero 19:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Battle of the Bulge Memoria Trail in Luxembourg. --Cayambe 19:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_PHEV_1X7A1859.jpg/120px-Hyundai_Tucson_(NX4%2C_SWB)_PHEV_1X7A1859.jpg)
- Nomination Hyundai Tucson (NX4, SWB) PHEV in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_1X7A1853.jpg/120px-Mercedes-Benz_C118_(2023)_1X7A1853.jpg)
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz CLA in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review Overall, the picture is a little too bright, the surroundings don't match the car at all and the purpose of the stripes on the door and side panel should be explained in the picture description. -- Spurzem 22:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination: The church of Saint Nickolaos of Moulos, Aegina. --C messier 18:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
CA on the branches --Mike1979 Russia 17:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Done --C messier 09:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Chrysoleontissa monastery, Aegina. --C messier 18:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
_1X7A1866.jpg/120px-Alpina_B4_(F33)_1X7A1866.jpg)
- Nomination Alpina B4 (F33) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cupra Formentor VZ5 BAT in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_1X7A1868.jpg/120px-DS_4_Cross_(2021)_1X7A1868.jpg)
- Nomination: DS 4 Cross (2021) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Wayside cross near Konz-Krettnach, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Impressive image and good quality -- Spurzem 22:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1829) near Konz-Oberemmel, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_-_exterior_in_morning_fog_2.jpg/86px-Saint_Clare_of_Assisi_Church_(Woodbridge%2C_Ontario)_-_exterior_in_morning_fog_2.jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Teodor_Economu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(03).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Teodor Economu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Teodor_Economu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(04).jpg)
- Nomination Grave of the Teodor Economu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/82px-Grave_of_the_Teodor_Economu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(06).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Teodor Economu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/70px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(01).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/106px-Grave_of_the_Zoe_and_Iov_Constantinescu_Brad_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(02).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Zoe and Iov Constantinescu Brad Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
-
- Nomination: Park of Neuenhofen Manor in Krefeld-Bockum --Carschten 16:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Fleur d'un Dahlia, Flower of a Dahlia --Paulparadis 15:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Brateyevo Cascade Park after 2012 renovations. Moscow, Russia. --Argenberg 14:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Early morning on Cheow Lan Lake in mist and fog, Surat Thani, Thailand. --Argenberg 14:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of Tamanyan Square and Yerevan city centre. Yerevan, Armenia. --Argenberg 14:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination: Tree heath (Erica arborea) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Burnt candytuft (Aethionema saxatile subsp, creticum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Female wild boar with piglets in Šumava National Park, Czechia. By User:Klara.vic --MIGORMCZ 11:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female wild boar with piglets in Šumava National Park, Czechia. By User:Klara.vic --MIGORMCZ 11:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/87px-Sinsheim_-_Ehrstädt_-_Schloss_Neuhaus_-_Kapelle_-_Ansicht_von_ONO_(1).jpg)
-
-
.jpg/120px-Schwäbisch_Gmünd_-_Altstadt_-_Ansicht_vom_Zeiselberg_(1).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Tallinn_Day_bus_festival%2C_Tallinn_(LRM_20220522_120741).jpg)
- Nomination: Historical and modern buses assembled for Tallinn Day at Freedom Square --MB-one 10:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/90px-Storti%2C_Agritechnica_2023%2C_Hanover_(P1140971).jpg)
- Nomination: Fodder mixing trailer by Storti at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 10:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Shark_Aero_UL%2C_AERO_2018%2C_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A4323).jpg)
- Nomination: Shark Aero UL at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 10:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Alpina_B7%2C_IAA_2017%2C_Frankfurt_(1Y7A3120).jpg)
-
.jpg/80px-EBACE_2023%2C_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(EB237581).jpg)
-
- Nomination Praga RN at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 09:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 10:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Škoda 903 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 09:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tank Mk 33 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 09:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tank Mk 33 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 09:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Tank LT 38 at Bahna 2018 military show, by Adam Hauner --Draceane 09:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
_breeding_2.jpg/80px-Eurasian_spoonbill_(Platalea_leucorodia)_breeding_2.jpg)
- Nomination Eurasian spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_female_and_juvenile_male_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_female_and_juvenile_male_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) female and juvenile male --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_female_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_female_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) female --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good quality --George Chernilevsky 10:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) female --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg/120px-Brown_booby_(Sula_leucogaster_plotus)_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
- Nomination Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) male --Charlesjsharp 08:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mansions, Avenue de Flandre 41 and 43, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 08:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
- Nomination: Boat on the Venice lagoon seen from Fondamente Nove. --Ermell 06:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
-
_02.jpg/80px-Naturdenkmal_ND-5822_Stieleiche_(Obereßfeld)_02.jpg)
-
-
.jpg/120px-D-6-74-133-70_Wegkapelle%2C_Hansenloh_(Eltmann).jpg)
-
- Nomination: Rutpela maculata mating on a leaf north of Kottenbrunn --Plozessor 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination CPEF 193 “Jiboia”. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aloe claviflora at Jardin de Cactus 2022. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Rain Vortex, Jewel Changi, Singapore. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Embraer EMB 110 at Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Enriqueta Compte and Riqué. By User:Mike Peel --XRay 05:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A linear representation of the visible light spectrum (by User:Gringer). --Artoria2e5 05:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
This is one of the better rendering of the visible spectrum. The author has taken care to preserve the color appearance using the Jch model. --Artoria2e5 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/76px-Protestant_church_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Portal of the protestant church in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/77px-Kirchgasse_1_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Kirchgasse 1 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/90px-Obere_Berggasse_3_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Obere Berggasse 3 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-P., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/70px-Old_town_hall_of_Bad_Bergzabern_(5).jpg)
- Nomination: Old town hall of Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/99px-Marktkirche_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(1).jpg)
- Nomination: Marktkirche in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_06.jpg/120px-Tarasp_(Taraspsee)_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_06.jpg)
- Nomination Taraspsee Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. Alps above the lake.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Taraspsee Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. Alps above the lake.
-
_01.jpg/120px-Tarasp_gemeente_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden.
-
_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_01.jpg/120px-Kasteel_Tarasp_(Tarasp_Castle)_Scuol%2C_18-09-2023._(actm.)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. (Fencing)
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination Tarasp Castle Scuol, in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. (Fencing)
-
- Nomination Manor house „Lieleg" on Hauptstraße #102 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern part of Keoti Fort, Rewa district, Madhya Pradesh --Tagooty 00:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside of south wall and south-west tower, Keoti Fort --Tagooty 00:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside of east wall and north wall in the distance. Keoti Fort, Rewa district --Tagooty 00:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Quadrado --Mike Peel 00:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
.jpg)
_PHEV_1X7A1859.jpg)
_1X7A1853.jpg)
_1X7A1866.jpg)
_1X7A1868.jpg)
_-_exterior_in_morning_fog_2.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_breeding_2.jpg)
_female_and_juvenile_male_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
_female_on_nest_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
_female_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay_2.jpg)
_male_in_flight_Michaelmas_Cay.jpg)
_02.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_gemeente_Scuol,_18-09-2023._(actm.)_06.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_Scuol,_18-09-2023._(actm.)_01.jpg)
January 23, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination Jessica Sherr at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 23:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Willard Morgan at the 40th Sundance Film Festival --Frank Schulenburg 23:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/80px-4_Rue_des_Sous-Riex%2C_Bourg-en-Lavaux_(2015).jpg)
- Nomination 4 Rue des Sous-Riex, Bourg-en-Lavaux --JoachimKohler-HB 23:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
.jpg/75px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(09).jpg)
- Nomination Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/71px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(10).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/75px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(11).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/75px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(12).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/80px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(13).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
- Nomination: L'embouchure de la Baye de Montreux dans le Léman. --Espandero 20:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: La commune de Veytaux vue depuis le Léman en 2023. --Espandero 20:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Nice composition but needs a little perspective correction - the buildings on both edges are leaning in. Happy to support once fixed. --BigDom 09:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
BigDom: Done - Espandero 19:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Gorges_de_la_Morge_de_Conthey_(4).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-NYPL_lion_in_the_snow_(90647).jpg)
- Nomination New York Public Library lion in the snow --Rhododendrites 18:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-White-throated_sparrow_in_the_snow_(90645).jpg)
- Nomination White-throated sparrow in the snow in Union Square Park --Rhododendrites 18:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality; nice with the snow on the beak. --Aristeas 10:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Zurich Main Station, the Swiss National Museum, and into the Limmat Valley --Oliylkaeng 18:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
the image is tilted and distorted towards edges --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Primavera da Praça Paris, Rio de Janeiro --Mike Peel 17:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Primavera da Praça Paris, Rio de Janeiro --Mike Peel 17:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination Bust of Cândido Mendes, Rio de Janeiro --Mike Peel 17:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you fix the dust spot in the left? --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
@Draceane: Done, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality now. --Draceane 08:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов1.jpg/120px-Старый_дом_(до_1917)_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов1.jpg)
- Nomination: Old building in Komsomolskaya Street. Hike along Efremov streets, frosty sunny day, -22 °С Юрий Д.К. 14:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов2.jpg/120px-Старый_дом_(до_1917)_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов2.jpg)
- Nomination: Old building in Komsomolskaya Street. Hike along Efremov streets, frosty sunny day, -22 °С Юрий Д.К. 14:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Schloss Winnental, palace in Winnenden, Germany, now a psychiatric clinic Megatherium 12:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Shmee_Ford_GT%2C_BAS_24%2C_Brussels_(P1170293-RR).jpg)
- Nomination: Shmee 150's Ford GT at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Mercedes-Benz_Actros_L%2C_BAS_24%2C_Brussels_(P1170123-RR).jpg)
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz Actros L semi-trailer tractor at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/96px-Adidas_Fit_7.11%2C_(LRM_20240112_080314-RR).jpg)
- Nomination: Adidas store Frankfurt Zeil with Fit 711 gym atop --MB-one 11:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Daimler_press_conference%2C_GIMS_2018%2C_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(1X7A0672).jpg)
-
-
_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg/120px-Black_swan_(Cygnus_atratus)_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg)
- Nomination Black swan (Cygnus atratus) cygnets --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose unfortunately, the right cygnet gets motion blur --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_with_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg/120px-Black_swan_(Cygnus_atratus)_with_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg)
- Nomination Black swan (Cygnus atratus) with cygnets --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_Kakadu.jpg/120px-Black-fronted_dotterel_(Elseyornis_melanops)_Kakadu.jpg)
- Nomination: Black-fronted dotterel (Elseyornis melanops) --Charlesjsharp 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Crème_caramel_(182729).jpg)
-
- Nomination T-34-76 produced by the Stalingrad Tractor Plant (STZ). --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sudoverf railway station --Mike1979 Russia 09:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Again, the blue colour should be fixed. --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Fixed. I'm colorblind. I saw dark blue not purple. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 08:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality now. --Draceane 22:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Altenbanz, aerial view. --Ermell 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Nice view! I may be wrong, but it seems that many verticals on both sides are leaning a little bit to the left. Could you please try if rotating the image ca. 0.1–0.3 degrees clockwise improves the overall impression? Thank you! --Aristeas 11:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Building of the Teissere Malherbe library. --Touam 06:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Before_2013_Solstice_Parade_068_(9139827592).jpg)
- Nomination: One of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence ready to march in Seattle's Fremont Solstice Parade --Jmabel 06:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Петергоф._Особняк_Гейрота._лев_(левый).jpg)
- Nomination: Left lion of Geirot mansion, Peterhof, Russia --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
The head is good, but the body obscured by the railing. I would support an image of the head, of a different angle with less railing. --Tagooty 03:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
My intention was to show how the lion looks over the railing at the visitors (it;s bank building now) but if you haven't caught this thought it's OK -- --Екатерина Борисова 23:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов1.jpg)
_на_ул._Комсомольская._Ефремов2.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg)
_with_cygnets_Scottsdale.jpg)
_Kakadu.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 22, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Stone bramble (Rubus saxatilis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nettle-leaved bellflower (Campanula trachelium) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nissan Townstar in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mitsubishi Colt Hybrid in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_1X7A1818.jpg/120px-Mini_Countryman_(U25)_1X7A1818.jpg)
- Nomination: Mini Countryman (U25) in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 19:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Triumph_Herald_1200_(Gottlieben%2C_2015).jpg)
- Nomination Triumph Herald 1200 --JoachimKohler-HB 17:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of the church of Agios Ioannis Avlonitsa, Naxos. --C messier 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Thawing puddle with leaves and other things in Freiham, Munich. Prominently visible is a advertisement from a nearby furniture store --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playground in Freiham, Munich beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station - nest swing --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playground in Freiham, Munich beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station - slide --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Balancing stick beside a footpath leading from Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße to the Freiham S-Bahn station --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The composition with the construction crane in the BG isn't optimal. --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tower crane depot at Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in the newly developping quarter of Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Inani_Beach_(135005).jpg)
- Nomination: Inani Beach. Moheen 16:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Mole_National_Park%2C_West_Gonja_(P1100395).jpg)
- Nomination: Water hole in Mole National Park --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-WPAhoi%2C_Waltershof%2C_Hamburg_(P1080492).jpg)
- Nomination: Seagull resting on a bulbous bow of an empty freighter in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/90px-Interboot_2023%2C_Friedrichshafen_(P1120960).jpg)
- Nomination: Demonstration of a foilboard at Interboot 2023 --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Twiliner%2C_Busworld_Europe_2023%2C_Brussels_(P1140004-RR).jpg)
- Nomination: Twiliner reclining seat demonstrator at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 12:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Krasnoarmeyskiy Bridge, Krasnoarmeisky district, Volgograd --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Krasnoarmeyskaya railway station --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs some color and shadows correction (чуть прибрать фиолетовое и желтое и высветлить тени слева) -- --Екатерина Борисова 23:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Tryed to fix. --Mike1979 Russia 13:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Support OK now --Екатерина Борисова 23:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Taigei SS-513. --Mike1979 Russia 10:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Private street, Avenue de la Marne, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 07:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Altenbanz in the district of Lichtenfels --Ermell 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
That has a strong blue tint ... --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
That's how it is at blue hour. --Ermell 08:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Personally I'd make it warmer, but my personal taste doesn't matter here. Picture is good. --Plozessor 06:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_08.jpg/120px-Val_Sinestra_16-09-2023._(actm.)_08.jpg)
- Nomination View of the mountains above Val Sinestra.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) - Promotion
Seems like something went wrong with the processing here. Trees on the left side appear partly grey and partly intense green. --Plozessor 05:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
* Done. Correction WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC) Support Ok now. Still the trees have two quite different shades of green, but it might be two different species or caused by the lighting. In any case it's looking way more natural now. --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination View of the mountains above Val Sinestra.
-
.jpg/67px-Marktstrasse_29_in_Bad_Bergzabern_(1).jpg)
- Nomination: Marktstraße 29 in Bad Bergzabern, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/117px-Grave_of_the_Rică_Ionescu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(07).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Rică Ionescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Stoicescu_and_San-Marin_Families_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(03).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Stoicescu and San-Marin Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 04:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
_1X7A1818.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_08.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 21, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: An Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) running on ice in parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy. --Plozessor 05:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: An Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) running on ice in parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 22:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This is noisy too. Should apply some more NR + sharpening. --Plozessor 05:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_-_high_altar_looking_up.jpg/75px-Saint_Rose_Church_(Perrysburg%2C_Ohio)_-_high_altar_looking_up.jpg)
- Nomination: perspective photo inside a church in Ohio: --Nheyob 21:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Case International 5130 Maxxum --JoachimKohler-HB 20:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Slightly tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 05:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Uploaded an improved version. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eltex Transistor Radio Model 707 --Berthold Werner 17:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/96px-Field_sprayer%2C_Agritechnica_2023%2C_Hanover_(P1160218).jpg)
- Nomination: Kverneland iXdrive self-propelled field sprayer at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/96px-Panasonic%2C_AIX_2023%2C_Hamburg_(PEW37882-RR).jpg)
- Nomination: Panasonic Astrova IFE on display at Aircraft Interiors Expo 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 17:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Photowalk%2C_Linz_(P1130878).jpg)
-
_–_h_21012024.jpg/120px-Mercedes-AMG_SL_43_(R_232)_–_h_21012024.jpg)
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG SL 43 (R 232) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_–_h_21012024.jpg/120px-Mercedes-Benz_CLE_200_Coupé_AMG_Line_(C_236)_–_h_21012024.jpg)
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz CLE 200 Coupé AMG Line (C 236) --M 93 15:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Ford GT 40 - 1965 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 14:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
-
_1X7A1652.jpg/120px-Mercedes-Benz_A_250_e_(V177%2C_2022)_1X7A1652.jpg)
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz A 250 e in Böblingen --Alexander-93 13:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tram LM-99 in Saint Petersburg city in old green livery --Svetlov Artem 11:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Picture is ok but it has invalid categories. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bus LiAZ-6212 in Saint Petersburg city --Svetlov Artem 11:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
The leaning buildings are quite distracting and should be fixed. --BigDom 09:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_female_with_suckling_pup_Kangaroo_Island.jpg/120px-New_Zealand_fur_seal_(Arctocephalus_forsteri)_female_with_suckling_pup_Kangaroo_Island.jpg)
- Nomination New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) female with suckling pup --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 20:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
_hopping.jpg/120px-Kangaroo_Island_Western_grey_kangaroo_(Macropus_fuliginosus_fuliginosus)_hopping.jpg)
- Nomination: Kangaroo Island Western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus) --Charlesjsharp 10:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Old terminal at Tenerife North Airport --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Canary Islands Chiffchaff feeding on nectar from a Pinninana planted under a Canary Islands Dragon Tree at Hijuela del Botanico, La Orotava, Tenerife. --Mike Peel 10:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_John_Cooper_Works_1X7A1819.jpg/120px-Mini_Countryman_(U25)_John_Cooper_Works_1X7A1819.jpg)
- Nomination: Mini Countryman (U25) John Cooper Works in Gerlingen --Alexander-93 09:13, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery%2C_unknown_owner_(75).jpg)
- Nomination: Relief on an unidentified grave in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Popescu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(03).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/90px-Grave_of_the_Popescu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(04).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Popescu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(08).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Popescu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(10).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Popescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Avenue 5 de Outubro in Valongo, Portugal. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
This is almost ok, but slightly tilted clockwise. --Plozessor 06:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Plozessor: I tilted it a little. What do you think? Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good now! --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in São Martinho de Angueira, Portugal. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
This needs at least perspective correction, like the other nominations. But it still is looks a bit overprocessed (massive NR plus sharpening) by the smartphone. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Overall quality is still not perfect as it's still a smartphone picture, but for me it is acceptable now! --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City Hall in Villebon-sur-Yvette, France. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
This needs perspective correction, like the other nominations. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main Building of the Myanmar Maritime University. --Petnog 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
This needs perspective correction, like the other nominations. --Plozessor 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@Plozessor: I corrected the perspective. Petnog 12:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Support Ok now! --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
_-_high_altar_looking_up.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_–_h_21012024.jpg)
_–_h_21012024.jpg)
_1X7A1652.jpg)
_female_with_suckling_pup_Kangaroo_Island.jpg)
_hopping.jpg)
_John_Cooper_Works_1X7A1819.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 20, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: La Perla beach at January 2024 in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 21:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: La Perla beach in Mar del Plata, Argentina in January 2024 --Ezarate 21:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Tuning_World_Bodensee_2018%2C_Friedrichshafen_(OW1A0071).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-EBACE_2023%2C_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(EB237793).jpg)
- Nomination: EBACE 2023 at Palexpo, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 21:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A red tabby cat staring at the camera. --Roc0ast3r 19:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
It needs a better crop at the bottom due to the shadow, maybe a crop at the top and better denoising. --C messier 21:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Done @C messier: Cropped and attempted to denoise. Let me know how that looks. --Roc0ast3r 23:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Monumento de los Derechos Humanos, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 13:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This looks dark, not sure if it was taken at night (if so, should say so), but could it be brightened? Could you also check if PC could be improved? --Mike Peel 10:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Comment I don't think I would change anything about the exposure. I also don't think an obsessive verticalization of the photo is appropriate. However, the photo needs to be rotated counterclockwise by just under 0.5°. --Smial 13:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panteón, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 13:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Hagi-Panteli_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(04).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/78px-Grave_of_the_Hagi-Panteli_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(05).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/76px-Grave_of_the_Hagi-Panteli_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(06).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Hagi-Panteli_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(07).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Hagi-Panteli Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 10:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Thawing puddle with leaves and other things in Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
I'd stretch the contrast a bit towards white. It uses less than 50 % of the brightness range and looks a bit dull. --Plozessor 04:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Office building at Clarita-Bernhard-Straße 9 in Freiham, Munich, constructed for Würth Elektronik eiSos GmbH & Co. KG as Hightech Innovation Center. Seen from Anton-Böck-Straße looking north. --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Slightly tilted --Plozessor 04:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Construction work in the area of Anton-Böck-Straße and Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in Freiham, Munich. Detail of a building with scaffolding seen from a footpath parallel to Anton-Böck-Straße --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction work around what is going to be the Mahatma Gandhi Square north of Bodenseestraße in Freiham, Munich - windows waiting to be installed --Kritzolina 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Зеленоградск%2C_кошка_(13).jpg)
- Nomination: Cat sleeping at the concrete block at Volodarskogo street. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Зеленоградск%2C_кошка_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Cat lying on a bench at the corner of Pogranichnaya street and Kurortny avenue. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --Smial 17:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Зеленоградск%2C_кошка_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Cat lying on a bench at the corner of Pogranichnaya street and Kurortny avenue. Zelenogradsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 04:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --Smial 17:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Detail of Geirot wooden house, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Catalyst Science Discovery Centre --Mike Peel 01:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pavilion in Gongsanseong Fortress, Gongju, South Korea --Bgag 00:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 19, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Egg Castle, Naples, Italy --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
The verticals should be checked. --Ermell 09:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Footpath parallel to Hans-Stützle-Straße and stairs south of S-Bahnhof Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tower crane depot at Centa-Hafenbrädl-Straße in the newly developping quarter of Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Сортавальский_р-н%2C_ГП_Рускеала%2C_Л_2180_на_поворотном_круге_(2).jpg)
- Nomination: Soviet locomotive Л 2180 at the turntable. Ruskeala park, Sortavalsky District, Republic of Karelia, Russia. By User:Avsolov --Красный 16:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Need perspective correction. --Mike1979 Russia 07:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Paddy fields captured near Pulla village --IM3847 16:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_-_exterior_1.jpg/86px-Saint_Mary%27s_Catholic_Church_(Rome%2C_Georgia)_-_exterior_1.jpg)
- Nomination: A church in Georgia, USA --Nheyob 15:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Alexandru_de_Linche_de_Moissac_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(19).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_D.H.A._Solacolu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(03).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the D.H.A. Solacolu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_D.H.A._Solacolu_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(04).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the D.H.A. Solacolu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Tree spurge (Euphorbia dendroides) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_Scottsdale.jpg/120px-Banded_lapwing_(Vanellus_tricolor)_Scottsdale.jpg)
- Nomination: Banded lapwing (Vanellus tricolor) --Charlesjsharp 09:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This seems extremely overprocessed somehow (in high resolution it looks strange). --Plozessor 16:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Siproeta stelenes on an orange at Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Siproeta stelenes on a plant at Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Phoenicopterus ruber in Chester Zoo --Mike Peel 07:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pond at the "Weihersbrunnen" ("pond fountain") in Dürrfeld --Plozessor 05:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_Baselga_de_Arlez_in_Ardez._17-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg/80px-Protestant_(Evangelisch-Reformiert)_Baselga_de_Arlez_in_Ardez._17-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg)
- Nomination: Church tower of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Church tower of the Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez.
.jpg)
_-_exterior_1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Scottsdale.jpg)
_Baselga_de_Arlez_in_Ardez._17-09-2023._(actm.)_04.jpg)
January 18, 2024[edit]
-
-
- Nomination: The church of the Taxiarches in Areopoli, Mani. --C messier 19:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction work around what is going to be the Mahatma Gandhi Square north of Bodenseestraße in Freiham, Munich - windows waiting to be installed --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Spilled oil in a parking lot in Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Graffiti in the underpass under S-Bahnhof Freham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Graffiti in the underpass under S-Bahnhof Freham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Footpath parallel to Hans-Stützle-Straße and stairs south of S-Bahnhof Freiham, Munich --Kritzolina 19:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: FL6 train passing through Labico railway station on the Roma-Cassino-Napoli railway line. By User:Manny Mannheimer --Remontees 18:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Good but slightly tilted. --Plozessor 19:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_the_Alexandru_de_Linche_de_Moissac_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(08).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/114px-Grave_of_the_Alexandru_de_Linche_de_Moissac_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(14).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/78px-Grave_of_the_Alexandru_de_Linche_de_Moissac_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(16).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/94px-Grave_of_the_Alexandru_de_Linche_de_Moissac_Family_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(17).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Palast Abazy Odessa --Hwyrd 16:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: El Castellet, Orba, Alicante, Spain --Poco a poco 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-2024_Szczoteczka_do_zębów_Oral-B_Pro_3_3000_(3).jpg)
- Nomination: Oral-B Pro 3 3000 toothbrush 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: European yellow-rattle (Rhinanthus alectorolophus) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 17, 2024[edit]
-
.jpg/71px-Grave_of_Gheorghe_Grigore_Cantacuzino_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(25).jpg)
- Nomination Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Journal of Society of Chemical Industry volumes, Catalyst --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
books cropped on both images --Charlesjsharp 10:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Not much I can do about that, sorry. Mike Peel 17:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Journal of Society of Chemical Industry volumes, Catalyst --Mike Peel 09:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
IMHO you should get the shelfs horizontal. --C messier 18:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
@C messier: Thanks for looking, perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Thi 18:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
.jpg/120px-IAA_Open_Space_2023%2C_Munich_(P1120004).jpg)
-
.jpg/90px-Photowalk%2C_Linz_(P1130888).jpg)
-
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 16, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Portrait of Epicurus, British Museum (by Jastrow) --Thi 20:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Can you denoise, and fix the CA top-left? --Mike Peel 21:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
I forgot to mention that the image is by another Wikimedian. The image is from 2011, so it seems that the best solution is to wait for new, better image. Thank you for the review. --Thi 11:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Moscow's Red Square on holiday. Moscow, Russia. --Argenberg 13:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Do you have any info about the event to add to the description? --C messier 21:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
C messier, thanks for having a look. I've added both the category and information about this sports event to the description. --Argenberg 13:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 18:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Convent of Santa Clara, Trujillo, Cáceres, Spain --Poco a poco 07:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
.jpg/80px-Grave_of_Gheorghe_Grigore_Cantacuzino_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(19).jpg)
- Nomination Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_Gheorghe_Grigore_Cantacuzino_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(21).jpg)
- Nomination Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support A bit noisy but IMHO good enough for QI. --C messier 18:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traditional Iftar in Old Dhaka. --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Please mention the creator in nomination (this is from Shariful Islam (Masum). --Plozessor 05:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Oppose Insufficient overall quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Construction of Padma Bridge (2019). By User:Azimronnie --আফতাবুজ্জামান 01:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Barrel distortion and vigneting need to be fixed. --C messier 20:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 15, 2024[edit]
-
.jpg/120px-Grave_of_Constantin_Tănase_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(05).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of Constantin Tănase in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Not really beautiful with all four sides crooked. Should skew it so that either the verticals or the horizontals are aligned. --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/85px-Grave_of_Gheorghe_Grigore_Cantacuzino_in_the_Bellu_Cemetery_in_Bucharest%2C_Romania_(17).jpg)
- Nomination: Grave of Gheorghe Grigore Cantacuzino in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 17:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
What exactly is that? (That should be in the description.) --Plozessor 19:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Roman city of Herculaneum, Italy --Poco a poco 16:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Quite blurry unfortunately. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Oppose Too blurry --Plozessor 05:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Litoměřice%2C_2020_(084).jpg)
- Nomination: View of Litoměřice --Draceane 09:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Quite prominent red and green CAs and needs perspective correction. --C messier 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
corrected --Draceane 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
There are still quite prominent CAs (see the chapel at the left). --C messier 21:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
done. --Draceane 20:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Červená_skala%2C_Trsteník%2C_2019_(05).jpg)
-
- Nomination Lasar Segall: Emigrantes --Mike Peel 08:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Check tilt/perspective, also I would crop a bit to the left for a more balanced composition. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
@C messier: Thanks for looking, perspective redone, and cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 08:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
January 12, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Grave on the Zell cemetery --Kritzolina 11:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Could be a bit brighter and sharper. --Plozessor 19:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
-
.jpg/96px-ZP_Bison%2C_Hamburg_(1X7A7973).jpg)
- Nomination: Tugboat ZP Bison pulling Con-Ro carrier Atlantic Sun in the port of Hamburg --MB-one 11:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Please check tilt/perspective. --C messier 21:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Better but still it is leaning out. Also maybe raise the shadows a bit and needs a description. --C messier 16:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Alcazaba, Málaga, Spain. By User:Poco a poco --XRay 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
This has significant CA on the left side of the window, otherwise would be good. --Plozessor 05:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC) New version I've reduced it a bit, not so easy --Poco a poco 12:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, the CA removal itself might be ok, but now there are some weird-looking spots in the window, see the note I added. --Plozessor 08:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC) New version (please, decide now whether it's good enough or not, I cannot improve it substantially) --Poco a poco 20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The CA could be acceptable now, but there are still some sharp white lines below and left from that person, looks like sharpening artifacts or something. See https://ibb.co/ZLBv2fV and https://ibb.co/LYXqTpm. --Plozessor 05:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)
January 11, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Graffiti Alley, Toronto --Another Believer 05:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Needs PC and better filename --Plozessor 19:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rail tracks at Bahnhof Ebenhausen-Schäftlarn - looking along the tracks towards Icking --Kritzolina 16:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Would be ok but is tilted and way too dark --Plozessor 19:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
January 10, 2024[edit]
.png)
January 9, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Geological mapping in Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository. --Kallerna 19:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review
IMHO the unsharp corners can be cropped and can you recover the highlights at the vest? --C messier 22:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
As you can see, the light conditions were challenging. I prefer it as it is. --Kallerna 18:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
January 8, 2024[edit]
-
- Nomination: Palace of La Cotilla, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 08:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review The building looks a bit unnaturally distorted. -- Spurzem 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC) New version --Poco a poco 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The right side is leaning in a bit. --C messier 15:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
January 6, 2024[edit]
-
.jpg/120px-San_Carlo_al_Corso_in_Rome_(7).jpg)
- Nomination: San Carlo al Corso in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Review Comment Is rotation necessary ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
It is an easy fix, you can ask a bot to do it. --C messier 00:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The request has been sent. --Tournasol7 05:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
OK. But I'm not sure about the WB, as it looks a bit too blueish. --C messier 21:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review[edit]
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}or{{oppose}}will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Senden,_Dortmund-Ems-Kanal,_Ufer_--_2024_--_9892.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Bank with woodland on the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
I have a neutral stance towards ICM, but all trees should be parallel at least (left are leaning to the left and right to the right). --Draceane 11:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Support Personally I like the crooked trees, they make for a more dynamic shot. Standard perspective correction wouldn't work (due to the vertical movement of the camera, the distortion is not constant across the frame) but I suppose one could use something like Photoshop's Perspective Warp to get rid of it. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Rosengarten_und_Palmenhaus_der_Insel_Mainau_(2015).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination Rose garden and palm house of Mainau Island, Lake Constance. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Unfortunately the roses are out of focus --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the roses in the foreground are just for framing. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IMHO it is distacting to have an out of focus frame (or foreground element in general) that hides what appears to be the main focus of the photo. --C messier 16:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The overall quality is borderline (even the in-focus garden is a bit noisy and blurry). The out-of-focus wall and roses might be "just for framing", which could look nice - but as they make up almost half of the picture, they should be sharper. It might look better when cropping the blurry wall away (leaving only 2 of the blurry roses in foreground). --Plozessor 05:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Human.svg[edit]
- Nomination Figures of a man and a woman from the Pioneer plaque (by Gmaxwell). --Thi 14:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Not created by a Commons user per description. --Plozessor 05:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support No offence, but please let us discuss what exactly the rules say to this special case. This is a SVG representation of a well-known (some would say: iconic) drawing. Because the SVG is a reproduction, I would expect the QI process to judge not the drawing, but the quality of the SVG representation. AFAIK the SVG has been created by a Commons user. So shoudln’t we accept this file and judge it on the base of the SVG representation – namely, whether it represents the original drawing accuratel and is of good technical quality? I would say so … --Aristeas 19:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Then the description is wrong. No issues with SVG representations of NASA works, but the description uses the template PD-NASA and clearly says that "This file is in the public domain in the United States because it was solely created by NASA.". If that is wrong, fix the description and then I'd support it. --Plozessor (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good hint! Yes, then the template {{PD-NASA}} is somewhat misleading here. At least it should be amended by a hint stating that the vectorization was done by somebody else. --Aristeas 11:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
File:D-6-74-187-13_Marienstatue.jpg[edit]
- Nomination 1933 statue of Mary in Falsbrunn --Plozessor 05:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The clouds are overexposed, sorry. --Tournasol7 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'd appreciate discussion about this 'overexposed clouds' issue. On a slightly cloudy day, you can't take a reasonable picture of an object in the shadow without parts of the brightest sunlit clouds overexposed. This could be worked around only with HDR, but I haven't read anywhere that HDR would be a prerequisite for QI. Personally, I would consider overexposed clouds a flaw in landscape photos, but not where the subject is a small object on the ground. --Plozessor 05:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No need for HDR here, this is simply overexposed. Not only the clouds, but also some parts of the object itself are clipping. With better exposure and some s-curving the contrast could have been handled. Note: Always select the lowest possible ISO setting that still allows a blur-free photo. All digital cameras then record the largest possible contrast range. With each whole step higher ISO setting, one f-stop of contrast range is automagically lost. And this is then missing when you fiddle around with a JPG from the raw image. (Subsequent S-curving of an already "developed" JPG is only useful to a very limited extent, as this can easily lead to banding or torn tonal value gradients). --Smial 08:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Smial: This was taken with the "lowest possible ISO setting" that my camera offers (ISO 100), and of course I applied all settings during RAW conversion, I did NOT "fiddle around with a JPG". Still, even the contrast range of an APS-C sensor at ISO 100 might not be enough to provide high detail for an object in the shadow AND for the bright sunlit parts of clouds. With higher exposure we lose detail in the clouds, with lower exposure we lose detail in the shadows. The subject of the image is the statue (not the landscape), and QI guidelines specifically say that an image must have enough details "in the shadows", so I wanted to get the best possible representation of the statue and did not care about the clouds. --Plozessor 09:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Smial, @Tournasol7, I've found that I made another shot with lower exposure. Replaced the image now, please evaluate the new one (make sure you don't view the old version from cache). This has now probably less detail for the statue, but the overall exposure is better. --Plozessor 10:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Question Which part of the Rules do you refer to? I found "Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element." And: " In correctly exposed images, details in a significant part of image are retained. " - well in a photo with sky and clouds in the composition, these are always significant.My comment about the ISO settings was not meant as a personal criticism, but as a general help with a practical example for anyone who is happy to receive tips. --Smial 11:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Smial: Yeah, interesting, the description says "lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic" while the left column of that same row ("Exposure") lists "lost details in shadow areas" as an issue. Anyway, what do you think about the new version? --Plozessor 12:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 09:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? --Augustgeyler 13:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Layla_-_Darkwah-104A1471.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Actor Darkwah at the premiere of the movie Layla at the 40th Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah --Frank Schulenburg 01:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Question Shouldn't persons' hair be complete on portraits? Most of these images have the heads cut off. --Plozessor 06:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Comment Cropping the hair at the top is a very common portait style. Of course this is a matter of taste, but IHMO we should not decline images just because they use a common style. --Aristeas 10:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I tend to disagree with the "cropping the hair at the top is a very common portait style" statement. I could not find any reference that states that, and just checking a random portrait category like [Category:2011 portrait photographs of men], there are hardly any photos with the hair cropped. --Plozessor 14:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Here are some websites of commercial photographers (almost arbitrary selection) which show that cropping the hair is common with “headshots”:
- We could find many more examples. I am not saying that one should do that, I just want to emphasize that this is a common style. Best, --Aristeas 19:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Depends on how you define "common", but the majority of portraits out there do not have the hair cut off. Anyway, in this particular case, the crop is really disturbing. Might be because that person's dark skin blends with the hair, so the photo gives the impression that the head is cut off. --Plozessor 05:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is insufficient categorization and other data. No caption, no "depicts" statement in the structured data, just a category for the event, nothing at all about the person on the photo. O.k., you can probably still find this image with the information from the file name and the description. And even if cutting a part of the hair off may be common style, this crop may impair the usability of the image, at least in my opinion. E.g., I would probably refrain from using this image for a Wikipedia article of the depicted person if I could find a good alternative image without this kind of crop. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Good image -- Spurzem 13:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great portrait. Cutting off the top of the head is done to keep the eys on the upper portion of the frame, which is flattering for most face types. One is of course free to dislike the result, but technically it serves a purpose. --Julesvernex2 19:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your attempt to explain the intention of the crop. However, the downward shift of the eyes by not cutting off some hair would have been tiny in this case. IMO this is obvious from other (commercial) photos of the same person at the same event that can be found on the web. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't find the difference negligible, particularly if the photographer needs to stick to a 3:2 aspect ratio (often a requirement for this type of images, so they can be quickly added to a pre-formatted publication). Compare it to Getty's Darkwah Sundance image ([1]), for instance. The same 3:2 aspect ratio, but with no chopped off head and placing the eyes on the one-third line. It's also a perfectly fine portrait, but personally I prefer Frank's: a more intimate close-up, better skin tones, no shadow, and it doesn't cost €475 :-). I understand that you have a different preference, that's fine. From a technical perspective, however, I don't see why this image should fail QI (apart perhaps due to the plane of focus, which is not quite on the eyes). --Julesvernex2 09:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Well exposed and, given the available lighting, quite well shot. Unfortunately, the focus is on the necklace and the hair, not the eyes. The cropping is a matter of taste, in my opinion it does not contribute to a better image effect in this case. Whether the landscape format is due to any agency specifications or production processes is, in my opinion, irrelevant for commons or QIC. --Smial 12:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Smial. --Tagooty 09:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Aristeas 19:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Senden,_Dortmund-Ems-Kanal,_Brücke_am_Kappenberger_Damm_--_2024_--_9875.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Bridge (Kappenberger Damm) over the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany/The shot used the creative technique of intentional camera movement. --XRay 04:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding. Unfortunately, the purpose of this technology remains a mystery to me. Even with perfect control, I consider them to be incompatible with the criteria for quality images. I don't see any benefit in such a distorted view of this bridge, even when it's intended. --Milseburg 14:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
Neutral Per Milseburg. Piece of art: Yes, QI: No. Also, even if ICM pictures would quality, this might not be a good example (it's tilted, the movement seems irregular). It's burned out and overcontrasted and has nothing to do with natural colors (which is ok for an artwork but not for QI.) --Plozessor 05:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) 
Info Two things I can understand (even well): Criticism of the design of a photo, even if it was made with techniques such as ICM, and a certain discomfort with the evaluation. Thanks to those who give their criticism here objectively. I am aware that these pictures are much more difficult to judge and that opinions are likely to differ widely. Our rules have exceptions to the evaluation (e.g. for SVG) and not all criteria can apply to photos taken with ICM. The rules apply to FPC and QIC. Not everyone likes artistic photos, but they should also find a gap. They are an expression of creative photography and thus part of our Wikimedia Commons world. The topic can be discussed in principle, but I see no reason to do so with this image. We must also remember that in addition to creative photographers, we also have those who take realistic pictures and have other Wikimedia projects in mind. --XRay 08:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)- @XRay: I'd appreciate a general discussion on the Discussions page about the question: What kind of images QI is about. My personal opinion is that QI should be somehow usable to illustrate Wikipedia. This would, however, rule out this type of pictures which are not useful to illustrate anything except the artistic technology used to create them. But, maybe that would be enough? Would be interesting to hear other opinions on that. --Plozessor 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't want to offend anyone. To put it bluntly: if our goal here was exclusively Wikipedia, I would say goodbye. I'm passionate about photography and its diversity and possibilities. It's important to me to try things out, to develop. This also includes creative approaches. I also take the more concrete photos that are suitable for Wikipedia. Not every photo is successful. But that's not everything for me. As has already been mentioned here, the Wikipedia-only approach is outdated and we should critically revise the rules for the FPC and QIC. --XRay 11:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- First of all, the images here (including QIs) also serve all the other Wikipedia's sister projects. List: Template:Wikipedia's sister projects, so let's put out the notion that images should only be for Wikipedias. Take a look at how wide the WikiProject really is, and how many different sorts of images this requires. Second, even artistic images like ICM can be used to illustrate Wikipedia articles. --W.carter 12:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Changing my vote to neutral for now, until we get a consensus whether this type of photo qualifies for QI. Still, @XRay: is the tilt in this picture intentional? --Plozessor 13:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I also thought about whether it was really tilted or not. It's difficult with this type of picture. The bridge is curved and this can at least create the effect. No tripod is used. --XRay 13:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support The QI rules have been formulated in a time when Commons was mostly a repository for Wikipedia illustrations – functional, tidy, and mostly very mediocre photographs (please don’t take this personally: all of my own photographs are very mediocre and boring, too). Over time Commons has matured to a general archive of free media for many purposes. If we punish creative photography, we turn away exactly our best photographers. So the QI rules certainly need an update. However IMHO we can already assess photos like this one when we follow the idea of a “quality image” idea and interpret the rules in that spirit. For a photo like this one, we may ask: Is the overall technical quality OK? Has the creative technique, here: the intentional camera movement, been selected for a subject for which it is fitting? Has the creative technique been used successfully, i.e. has it enriched the photography to express something or to give an impression which would not have been possible with a “normal” photograph? IMHO the answer is yes in this case. Best, --Aristeas 11:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What is the content that this image wants to communicate? The image stands out clearly from the others and is therefore certainly interesting. But if such alienation becomes fashionable in the future and all possible motifs are presented in this or a similar way, a separate award should be set up for it. There seems to be more focus on art and creativity than objective quality standards. Certainly this is not what anyone looking for a quality image of this bridge needs. --Milseburg 17:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Does every picture have to convey content? And maybe someone is just looking for an abstract representation of the bridge and is happy to find these pictures here too. Who knows? --XRay 08:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, at least for me there's no doubt that your picture should be in Commons. The only question is whether it can be a QI, mainly because it's impossible to apply most of the relevant criteria to it. --Plozessor 10:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- How do you judge "exposure" for an image that is intentionally overexposed?
- How do you judge "color" for an image that intentionally uses false colors?
- How do you judge "focus" for an image that is out of focus intentionally?
- How do you judge "blur" for an image that is intentionally blurred?
- How do you judge "distortion" for an image that is intentionally distorted?
- --Plozessor 10:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, that sounds like a desperate search for a set of rules. I certainly remember such discussions, e.g. for image resolution in wildlife photography. Certainly some things are difficult to name. Is the shot just blurred or is it a design element? We even have categories for both: Intentionally blurred images and Blurred images. --XRay 10:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, "a set of rules" is required to decide whether something is a QI or not. Obviously the existing "rules" - exposure, color, focus, blur, etc. - are not really suitable for judging artistic images like yours. So we need some criteria: What makes an artistic image an artistic quality image? Do you have suggestions? --Plozessor 14:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this is a kind of photographic quality I would like to see more of --Kritzolina 08:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I can't see anything. --Sebring12Hrs 13:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support If we want to be objective, given the constraints foreseen for Q.I., the conditions should not exist because they mainly involve overcoming technical aspects. I think there needs to be an overhaul when it comes to creativity. Movement or, more precisely, blur have always been viewed with horror, as one of the mistakes to absolutely avoid. Through blurring we can create fairy-tale atmospheres or give a particular dynamism to the photos and, why not, use the camera as if it were a brush with which to spread colors on a canvas. Photography thus (in my opinion) becomes art. Photos don't just have to be documentation. I believe that xRay has the right to "create" emotions and sensations through photography that go beyond the simple subject photographed. In these cases the objective standards leave room for subjective sensations, so I don't feel like criticizing those who voted negatively, simply because they did not receive sufficient emotions or they were not convinced by the creator's work. --Terragio67 21:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have a similar opinion as User:Plozessor. I just cannot understand what the criteria should be for evaluation of the quality of such an image. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If you look at other pictures done with that technique, you will soon see the differences. This one has very clear lines that speak of the intent (many don't). The coloring is very interesting, nothing ist just an unclear mushy grey or brown. We can see the bridge and something I would call the idea of the bridge. This is really high quality. --Kritzolina 17:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The picture is quite pretty, but the blurring serves no technical purpose or to emphasise a particular feature of an object. A canal bridge like this is not usually travelling very fast. I don't think QIC is the right place to judge artistic expression. And even if I am of the opinion that a photo can become QI even if the photographer does not slavishly adhere to the usual, customary rules of composition, I do not feel called upon to judge artistic value. Apart from that, a photo of this type should not show any image noise (if blurred, then at least consistently) and no overexposed areas. --Smial 07:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Milseburg. --Augustgeyler 13:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Milseburg and Smial. I think QI as it exists is not the place for this image. --Tagooty 09:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline? --Augustgeyler 13:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Clouds_at_the_edge_of_Netravati_peak_from_the_summit_of_the_mountain_(2).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination Clouds at the edge of Netravati peak from the summit of the mountain --IM3847 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion Support Borderline sharpness, but ok at lower resolution --Plozessor 17:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Oppose Nearly half of the image is overexposed. Can you recover the highlights? --C messier 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is ok. But must agree to C messier, Whites are clipping. --Smial 11:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]
- Thu 18 Jan → Fri 26 Jan
- Fri 19 Jan → Sat 27 Jan
- Sat 20 Jan → Sun 28 Jan
- Sun 21 Jan → Mon 29 Jan
- Mon 22 Jan → Tue 30 Jan
- Tue 23 Jan → Wed 31 Jan
- Wed 24 Jan → Thu 01 Feb
- Thu 25 Jan → Fri 02 Feb
- Fri 26 Jan → Sat 03 Feb